How The Roulette Prediction Formula Evolved Over Time

By Carl Lee


A lot of people have the misconception that since roulette trials are at random for every turn, it is scientifically impossible to predict what number one can get. While this may be true in some way, that does not mean that it is totally impossible to increase winning chances. In fact, a lot of roulette prediction formula methods have been created over time to try to beat the game.

Now, one disclaimer to take note of is that there is no one hundred percent winning strategy that one can use in the casino. What these strategies can do is that they just try to give an edge so that one has higher chances of winning. Even if one wins a number of times, there will still definitely be some losses that go along with it.

The first method that a lot of people usually try to learn would be the unbalanced wheel method. Coined by amateur mathematician William Jaggers, the slight tilt of the wheel will be able to give one an advantage. According to Jaggers, the number at which the ball will land on will most likely be somewhere in the direction where the wheel is tilted so the best thing to do is bet on those numbers.

Now, while this one would focus on the biased wheels, physics calculations were eventually introduced. According to a scientist named Henri Poincare, the component that really predicts the winnings of the game would be the initial velocity. By knowing the rate of the initial velocity of the ball, then one will be able to find a pattern that will allow him or her to know where to place a bet.

Contrary to what Poincare said, another scientist by the name of Richard Epstein stated that the angular velocity was the critical component. He also stated that the initial velocity was not as important as the angular velocity since the angle is what would usually determine what number pops out. This is especially true for the already tilted wheels.

In a more modern setting, chaos theorists Michael Small and Chi Kong Tse where able to find rather detailed ways on how to try to one up the chances of a winning bet. According to these two scientists, knowing the initial conditions was good enough. In fact, knowing initial conditions would enable one to have a 59% chance of knowing where the ball can land.

Small further stated that one must first try to make an estimate as to how long it takes for the ball to make a full round on the wheel. From there, one can compute for the velocity of the wheel. After calculating the velocity, one will at least be able to know which side the ball will land on.

According to Small, it is also much better to know where exactly the ball will land on titled tables. So if ever the table is not straight and one knows which side the wheel will choose to rest on, then the chances of winning are even higher. With that, it is possible to make a winning bet.




About the Author: